Legal & Methodology Centre
Index Data Sources
GRandCIndex synthesises intelligence from public, authoritative sources. Source provenance and limitations are made explicit by design.
01
Source types
Content on GRandCIndex may originate from, or refer to, the following categories of public sources:
- Public regulatory publications and supervisory communications
- Governmental announcements, white papers, and legislative records
- Intergovernmental and multilateral institutional outputs
- Recognised standards bodies and technical standards documents
- Authoritative industry frameworks and codes of practice
- Other high-credibility public sources relevant to AI governance
02
Source validation
Sources are evaluated against an internal credibility hierarchy that prioritises authoritative, attributable, and verifiable publications. Editorial review applies cross-reference checks against parallel sources where available, assesses temporal relevance, and tracks source revisions. Sources that are deprecated, withdrawn, or downgraded in authority are removed from active reliance.
03
Limitations of third-party information
GRandCIndex relies on third-party sources that are outside its control. The following limitations apply to all platform content:
- Source publishers may revise, supersede, or retract documents after they have been referenced.
- Publication and translation lags may delay the appearance of relevant developments.
- Jurisdictional coverage is uneven — not all regions have equivalent public reporting depth.
- Source-level errors, ambiguities, or omissions may propagate into intelligence outputs despite editorial review.
- Cross-source contradictions are inherent to a fragmented regulatory environment.
04
No endorsement
Reference to any source, organisation, framework, jurisdiction, or actor on GRandCIndex is descriptive, not evaluative. Inclusion does not imply endorsement, partnership, or affiliation. Exclusion does not imply criticism or non-recognition.
